Skip to main content
Glama

Cenogram - Polish Real Estate Data

Ownership verified

Server Details

7M+ real estate transactions from Poland's RCN registry. Search, compare, and analyze prices.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.6/5 across 27 of 27 tools scored. Lowest: 3.7/5.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

All 27 tools have clearly distinct purposes with thorough descriptions. Despite many tools dealing with similar domains (e.g., price statistics vs. price distribution vs. price spread), each targets a different aspect or output format. The get_transaction_* tools each cover a unique enrichment layer, and search tools are distinguished by spatial method. No two tools are easily confused.

Naming Consistency4/5

Naming largely follows a verb_noun pattern: 'get_' for data retrieval, 'list_' for enumeration, 'search_' for transaction queries, with a few exceptions like 'compare_locations', 'estimate_value', 'resolve_parcel'. The deviations are sensible and intuitive, but the set is not perfectly uniform (e.g., 'list_price_spread_locations' vs 'list_locations'). Overall consistent and predictable.

Tool Count3/5

27 tools is on the high side but appropriate given the complexity of the Polish real estate domain. The tool set covers parcel data, transactions, demographics, infrastructure, price analytics, and multiple enrichment layers. While some consolidation might be possible, each tool serves a distinct analytical need and the count does not feel bloated.

Completeness4/5

The surface is remarkably comprehensive, covering transaction search (by filters, area, polygon), parcel reports, price analysis, demographic/infrastructure data, and numerous parcel enrichment layers. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct property-to-property comparison (only area-level via compare_locations) and no rental market data beyond yield estimation, but the core workflows (discover, evaluate, due diligence) are well supported.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources