Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) vulnerability scanner. Detects ECDSA, RSA, AES-128 and other quantum-vulnerable algorithms in GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket repos and Ethereum smart contracts. Returns risk score 0-100, CBOM (CycloneDX 1.6), and migration paths to NIST FIPS 203/204/205. Free tier: 10 scans/day, no key required.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.2/5 across 4 of 4 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation4/5

Tools have distinct purposes: check_pqc_risk is an instant algorithm check, scan_repository is async repo scanning, scan_contract is synchronous contract scanning with fraud detection, and get_scan_result polls repo scans. Descriptions clarify usage, though check_pqc_risk and scan_repository both address quantum vulnerability but at different levels, causing slight ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: check_pqc_risk, get_scan_result, scan_contract, scan_repository. The naming is clear and predictable.

Tool Count5/5

With 4 tools, the set is well-scoped for a specialized PQC scanner. Each tool serves a distinct need: instant check, async repo scan, synchronous contract scan, and result retrieval. No unnecessary tools, and the count feels appropriate.

Completeness4/5

Core workflows are covered: quick risk assessment, full repository scanning, contract scanning, and result fetching. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to list or cancel scans, but the surface is largely complete for the stated purpose.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources