Skip to main content
Glama

RNWY — AI Agent Trust Intelligence

Ownership verified

Server Details

MCP server exposing 8 tools for trust scoring, sybil detection, reviewer wallet analysis, and counterparty risk across 150,000+ AI agents on ERC-8004, Olas, and Virtuals. Streamable HTTP, JSON-RPC 2.0, no API key required.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 3.3/5 across 10 of 10 tools scored. Lowest: 2.6/5.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation3/5

Some tools have overlapping purposes (e.g., entity and trust_check both provide agent trust info; risk_terms and mcp_attestation both provide risk scores). Address_age and reviewer_analysis focus on wallet age but in different contexts, which helps. However, tools like entity and reviewer_wallet both provide sybil signals, causing potential confusion.

Naming Consistency3/5

Tool names use a mix of noun and verb phrases (e.g., address_age, compare_agents, trust_check). Some are descriptive but inconsistent in style (e.g., reviewer_wallet vs. reviewer_analysis). No clear verb_noun pattern, but readable overall.

Tool Count4/5

10 tools is reasonable for a trust intelligence server covering wallet analysis, agent trust, network stats, and risk assessment. Each tool addresses a distinct aspect, though a few could be merged without loss.

Completeness3/5

Covers core trust and risk dimensions: age, activity, sybil detection, risk scoring, attestations. Missing are tools for updating or submitting data (e.g., no tool to report a reviewer or submit an attestation), which might be needed for full lifecycle. Gaps are notable but not critical for read-heavy use.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources