Skip to main content
Glama

Clearance Adjudications Search Engine

Ownership verified

Server Details

Search 30,000+ decided U.S. security-clearance (DOHA) decisions: cases, outcomes, statistics, and timelines, with a citable link for every answer. CASE is the searchable public record of DOHA industrial security-clearance decisions from 1996 to the present, refreshed nightly.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.9/5 across 6 of 7 tools scored. Lowest: 3.2/5.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_candor_outcomes for candor analysis, get_case for single case details, get_conduct_recency for recency statistics, get_statistics for overall stats, get_timelines for timeline metrics, search_cases for full-text search, and similar_cases for case similarity. No overlap.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_candor_outcomes, search_cases, similar_cases). The naming is predictable and clear.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is an ideal number for this domain, covering core operations (search, retrieve, analyze) without being overwhelming or too sparse.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers search, retrieval, statistics, timelines, recency, candor analysis, and similarity. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no bulk export or appeals-specific tools), but the core adjudication analysis workflow is well-supported.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources