Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

On-brand product photos, model try-ons, video reels & banners from a brief + brand kit.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.7/5 across 19 of 22 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with detailed descriptions. Even related tools like lamina_brand_compliance, lamina_brand_feedback, lamina_brand_score, and lamina_refine_to_brand are well-differentiated by their specific roles. The generate tools (image, video, workflow) are distinct, and the workflow tools (create, discover, describe, run) form a clear flow with no overlap.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools use the 'lamina_' prefix with snake_case. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., lamina_generate_image, lamina_set_brand). Some exceptions like lamina_app_versions (noun_verb) and lamina_brand (noun) are minor but prevent a perfect score. Overall the naming is predictable and consistent.

Tool Count4/5

22 tools is on the higher side, but the domain is complex—covering brand management, app lifecycle, atomic generation, credits, and asset upload. Each tool has a clear role, and the number is appropriate for a comprehensive creative workflow server. It is slightly above the ideal range but not excessive.

Completeness3/5

Core workflows are well-covered: discovery, creation, running, status, brand management, compliance, and credits. However, there are gaps: no tool for listing runs, no delete app tool, and no way to generate a report of all apps. These gaps are notable but the primary workflow (create -> run -> monitor -> refine) is complete.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources